I mean. I’m not siding with Renner, here. I initially pointed out an observation I didn’t see anybody making.

I replied to you specifically because it seemed to me you were discounting Renners contribution to the success of the first season. I do think it’s fine for him to be publicly pissed about this, if what he’s saying is true. I don’t know either way but if he left those meetings feeling that way, there may be a reason and there’s no reason to assume he’s just a rich guy being a rich asshole.

So in your estimation, you don’t think he should be upset that Disney, one of the biggest organizations in the world, is refusing to pay him what he believes is value to be?

Many people are ignoring another part of the formula. Actors draw views. Renner is the main interest I have in Hawkeye. Kate Bishop is a fine character, but personally Renner is why I watched season 1. Charlie Cox and Vincent D’nofrio are the reason I watched the new Daredevil series.

Renner might be blowing it out of proportion, but the reality is without his involvement I’m probably going to skip it.

I’ll give each character a chance to stand on their own but I’m not personally interested in Kate Bishop as a story driver.

I completely agree with that sentiment. I think the d20 itself is flawed in that it provides linear probability. I’m more a fan of 3d6 for the bell curve it provides.

When it comes to the damage, I can agree that a degree of success should play into it. I do like how white wolf systems carried the success level over into the damage roll.

Conveniently, clicking through to the actual data returns a 404.

I generally agree. For one shots, there are much slimmer systems out there.

I’m not sure I agree about splitting hit and damage feeling weird, but it definitely is slow. But overall, yeah. DnD is generally one of my least favorite systems to play in.

That first chart isn’t even trying to hide that is fake. It’s depicting a perfect mirroring.

The post isn’t claiming perfection. It’s claiming production ready. Very different things.

The confusion there is the claim that good/perfect means done. It means ready for use and extensible.

Note: I’m not agreeing/disagreeing with the claim. Just clarifying the point

You sure? You seem rather confused by the math, my friend.

As much as I don’t like OpenAI, I’m not looking forward to it going under. This new industry sucks, but it’s going to suck more when turns out only already established megacorps can afford to enter the market.

I’m gonna take a slightly different approach on this one.

If you live in an area which gets to sub zero temperatures and didn’t consider the impact that has on batteries before buying electric, this one’s on you.

Don’t exclude. There are definitely some self important people driving older Teslas, too. A lot of previous BMW drivers made the switch years ago for image reasons.

Hey now, they aren’t Nazis. Nazis at least believe in something, even if it’s something terrible.

The only thing making his life difficult is his constant need for attention

I’d bet it’s less simple input sanitizing and more 2 mistakes made separately because they don’t know any better.

1. The input field converting everything to a string indiscriminately
2. Because they did 1, converting everything back to the assumed type

If the front end Dev makes the first mistake, null would be sent in the body as “null”. Then on the backend, somebody might even be binding the variables correctly, but before hand realizing they have to deal with the market and rather than just have a conversation undoes it in their own code.

Also, Pepsi Max is a zero calorie drink, so 1 a day is hardly a lot. Three artificial sweeteners aren’t the best for you, but OP shouldn’t feel like they are ruining their health on that.

To this point, for me, it was all about the bubbles. So replacing with a seltzer water did wonders. Sometimes I still have a craving to pound bubbles real quick.

To answer disassociating you. You had help. That’s how.

Real talk, what is the real barrier to somebody creating a competing publishing firm for these things.

I’m not a scientist, but I always hear about how expensive it is to either publish or get access to scientific papers without contacting the author directly. Why does that reputation exist? Why does it seem like the scientific community is so dependent on stuff like this?

There should 1(5), and preferably only 1(5), really obvious way(s) to do it.

“After our District officials shared public statements, we learned that the agents who visited the school were from the U.S. Secret Service,” the spokesperson said. “Two individuals showed up at the school door and presented identification that includes the name Department of Homeland Security, the federal agency that oversees ICE. School officials proceeded to respond to the agents with the understanding that they were from ICE, amid rumors and reports that the agency was in the community.”

Source

It appears that the school officials assumed they were ICE. Everything else is awful about this but I’d ask that we be mad about the correct things. This does not appear to be a situation where the Secret Service attempted to mislead anybody. They didn’t identify which department of HS they were with, just that they were with HS.

The fact that the Secret Service showed up to a school to go after a teenager for paying a video is terrible, though.