Yeah I’m doing work today so I can get you the exact figure. So this is kind of a composite of different research as we have two points here:

• heightened pay disparity leads to all the outcomes I described earlier (Wilkinson, R. & Pickett, K. 2020; Bloom, 1999; Bloom & Michel, 2002)
• research assessing what this level of disparity looks like in companies for CEO pay (n= 55,238, 45 countries sampled) shows that individuals roughly find justifiable pay should be between 5-10x the lowest paid employee. So if you have your lowest paid employee making 75k the CEO should only make a maximum of 750k to keep a level of perceived equity. (Kiatpongsan & Norton, 2014)

This is actually supported in the scientific literature as we know that once the pay disparity between leaders and employees goes over a certain threshold it starts to decrease basically everything for employees from wellbeing to basic productivity (I know the citation but not home and lazy to send it). Problem is most organizations don’t actually really want to make good effective workplaces that are good for everyone as they only want to benefit the people on top in the short term.

I’m Jewish and I don’t get it either, every Jew I see falling for this fascist rhetoric horrifies and disgusts me

Cognitive ability tests aren’t that straightforward and no online random free one is going to actually be representative of a true one. Even traditional “IQ” tests are not just a number you get. Most people with ADHD have what we call “spikey” profiles on most tests of individual differences. This is partially because we just have different strengths and weaknesses from neurotypicals that comes out in testing and the other part is these tests usually aren’t made for people with neurodivergances and results tend to come out strangely (if you take any personality test based on big 5 or hexaco you’ll probably have way lower contentiousness scores for example). You aren’t a genius, but you also aren’t stupid, you’re just you with all the strengths and flaws.

I think everyone is, especially the people who are thought of as less capable by the colour their skin

Typical for the conservatives here

There is a reason the Talmud is basically a collection of massive extensive debates. Our religion isn’t necessarily coherent or consistent and it takes a very long time to become a Rabbi for a reason.

I’m a Jewish person and I don’t see blood libel in this. They provided some interesting points and while I don’t fully agree they aren’t painting Jews as evil or others as good, just trying to reconcile our beliefs with these recent atrocities.

This is a situational judgement test, not a personality test, they are not the same thing

Why would socialist halt development?

I live in this neighborhood, let me tell you, you fucking don’t. I don’t own a car, I have 0 problem getting anywhere or doing anything. If I ever need that kind of vehicle our city had an entire service to easily get one for very cheap.

Also this isn’t even an article, it’s just a picture of travel books

I’m surprised more user friendly distros don’t have this, especially more commercial ones

Experience has one of the lowest predictive validity out of all job selection criteria. Situational judgement is fine but I’d suggest pairing it with structural behavioral interview and job knowledge as a replacement for experience https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2022-17327-001

Let’s say you live on the moon and need to reach earth for the funeral of your Aunt who rules the underground city of Uthrangon.

You are discussing edge cases. Urban planning should consider edge cases but not base the code design of a city after them.

Those cost more, and with the tariffs I doubt he can afford it

Are you off your meds or something?

So I’m a researcher in the field of Organizational Psychology so I have mostly insight on the “leadership part” as opposed to their experience mostly in Human Computer Interface. They aren’t wrong here but the study they conducted seems very basic as well. It’s good that it’s an actual lab experiment but I wouldn’t say it has much generalizablilty to an actual working environment. I’d say they would need to redo the study with conditions of trust building as they are really only indicating that humans are predesposed to make connections with other humans and be able to work with them, which we already know.

Do you want a genuine definition of the phrase?

As a Canadian, I’d rather die