Original artwork by Max Feito

For me, it’s more of a list of people who have proven themselves to be shitty so that I can avoid using my limited time on this plane dealing with them.

I love having an electric mower. Significantly less maintenance.

You seem to have an uncanny ability to be immune to underestimation. If you look back over what I said without the veil of selfishness, it would be plain that my issue is with you being inconsiderate and rude by posting porn in an inappropriate place and following it up with a facade of remorse, not because of pedantry over the rules.

It seems fitting that you jumped to the conclusion that I was calling you puny in particular, even though I was describing people who find joy in a sad attempt to needlessly insult other people.

Do I think I am superior to others who find joy in hurting others without warrant? Absolutely. Anyone who invests even a mere modicum of effort in trying to be a decent person would very likely have a decent argument for that claim. I’m sad for you that you seem to be unable to do so yourself, but more sad for the world that has to bear your presence anyway.

You’re missing the point. I’m not chastising you because of the rule alone.

I already said this before:

That allows people to expect not to randomly run into porn

Do you think everyone is okay with just having porn on their phone out in public?

It’s your obligation to make sure you abide by the rules of the community when you are participating in it. So, yes, a person should assume that the sidebar is read. I can understand skipping reading the rules when you are making a normal comment, but if you’re going to post literal porn, then you better damn well check the rules first because most communities would not allow it.

It’s not naive to hope a message gets across. In fact, I said “hope” specifically because it’s not an expectation, as they’ve shown evidence to not care about others. Though, it’s odd they would waste their time with a meaningless reply to my comment if they at least didn’t care at least a little; thus, the hope.

Lastly, I hope you realize how much of an ass you’ve made yourself out to be considering how you’ve made apparent your capability of being ignorant and hasty. Particularly in that you did not even fully read my username and instead assumed you know what my username is. I suggest you familiarize yourself with Linux, on top of your clearly dire need to learn how to not jump to conclusions and out yourself as a fool. However, I’m confident my hope won’t be met with a positive result, since your comment serves no purpose other than an attempt to be rude for fun. I pity puny people that placate their propensity for pleasure by pathetically peddling pejorative speech upon other people.

Bad joke in the wrong place. It’s clearly stated in the community that NSFW content like that is prohibited. That allows people to expect not to randomly run into porn when they don’t want to. Yet here you are shoving porn into people faces against their will. “Other people like it” is not an excuse for selfishness like this.

You say “sry” but you still don’t remove your comment and the fact you don’t even bother to spell out the word belies that sentiment. I hope you see how bafflingly rude you’ve been here.

Why the hell are you posting porn? Did you actually think that people would like that? Go back to 4chan.

Could you please just spend the 5 seconds it takes to get the original image instead of one taken by screenshot that has an overlay on top of it? I’m tired of seeing your posts with the same overlay. It takes effectively no time or effort. I would rather have fewer posts on Lemmy than lazy posts like this.

Data breaches are already commonplace, though. People don’t really care about that, so news outlets don’t care to cover it.

This is vastly different and would be a new thing that everyone would be interested in hearing about. So many people think that this is happening, but have no proof. They would love to be able to say “See! There’s finally proof! I told everyone!”

It can be proven, very easily. All it takes is a little bit of IT skills and a basic understanding of networking. There are also immense amounts of incentive to prove it. Your information would be spread across every news network, and you’d be able to use it to sue any business that does it.

So, the only reason it can’t be proven is because it’s not happening.

Not cashing in on brand names.

What is this in reference to?

it’s not literally a… that thing

Can someone tell me what it is, please?

Miss identifying someone has consequences

What about Miss Identifying’s parents, Mr and Mrs Identifying?

Ah yes, the “splurdge” part of the article, a word everyone knows as a very technical term that’s used for filling in for an inability to articulate an actual line of logic. Instead of logic, just explain that “I don’t like the conclusion of the article, so it must be wrong somehow even though I can’t explain why.”

It’s also important for people to chime in that an article must be wrong because it just “feels wrong”. Of course don’t actually provide any reasoning for it, because why would that be necessary?

Don’t forget how useful it is to ask a question, completely ignoring that the article addresses it. Don’t even bring it up in the questioning. When someone points that out, then the best strategy is to lash out at them, because they were such a big meanie by pointing out the obvious problem of not reading the article.

Lemmy communities are all about feelings, not information!

Oh, also I took a screenshot of your comment because I knew you were going to edit it.

If you read the article, you’d know. Thanks for making a comment, even though you didn’t.

This might be the worst quality image I’ve ever seen posted to this community. It took literally seconds to find the original. I would much rather have fewer posts on Lemmy if it means not having awful quality images like this.

Here is the original post from the artist:

https://www.deviantart.com/immortalundead/art/Alien-yelling-at-Predator-1078321372

Lead lead

For all the people who keep still saying “no, they are definitely doing it because of this one anecdote that wasn’t even properly tested, but trust me bro it’s real.” (Like [email protected] and [email protected])

Anyone with even a basic understanding of networking can realize how this could be easily tested and proven, especially by the millions of people with deep comprehension, experience, and tools on hand. There is so much incentive to prove this, particularly if the information was then used to sue these companies. So, why hasn’t anyone done this?

Because what the article says is true. They don’t listen to everyone’s conversations. It’s easier and significantly cheaper to just use the data they have on you to both influence you and predict you.

Per artist they violated, which is a lot of different artists that they have stolen from.