1. Have you read the post?

2. If you’d like to refute the content on the grounds of another scientist, can you please provide a reference? I will read it

I don’t think this answers the question

What would Altman gain from overstating the environmental impact of his own company?

You should consider the possibility that CEOs of big companies essentially always think very hard about how to talk about everything so that it always benefits them

I can see the benefits, I can try to explain if you’re actually interested

This isn’t my article and yes that’s controlled for

I actually think that (presently) self hosted LLMs are much worse for hallucination

Do you hold Sam Altman’s opinion higher than the reasoning here? In general or just on this particular take?

Thank you for your considered and articulate comment

What do you think about the significant difference in attitude between comments here and in (quite serious) programming communities like https://lobste.rs/s/bxixuu/cheat_sheet_for_why_using_chatgpt_is_not

Are we in different echo chambers? Is chatgpt a uniquely powerful tool for programmers? Is social media a fundamentally Luddite mechanism?

Every time I see a comment like this I lost a little more faith in lemmy

No it doesn’t

Cool I think that applies

But let’s use the device as a tool for thought rather than an Oracle

In doing so, let’s examine the counterfactual: do you think the Harris campaign likely was privy to knowledge that we are not and which isn’t shared? I absolutely do

Not really. In California it’s called a smog check

And many American states do not have any kind of mandatory inspection

The UK MOT covers a lot more than just emissions. The vehicle needs to have appropriate tyre tread, windscreen in safe working order, no check engine light, etc. And mileage is recorded to reduce potential for fraud. Many other things are checked.

This is a fucking wild take

America/10

They have a few different products including plain water

Wow, TIL that the speed of sound has this equivalence

Can you tell me what you think the confounding factors are?

Oh excuse me. I’m using “the bicameral system” to refer to “the way representation works in USA”. A more accurate and relevant way to point to the bad part would be “the two party system”, since in fact you could reasonably have a bicameral congress with proportional representation

I live in England, that would be a good starting point for your Google search

I think you’re trying to mock me but in fact this is exactly what I’m saying

I am very notably not defending Harris but lemmings have spent too much time on xitter to remember what critical discourse looks like

Unfortunately, that is also a fact