alyaza [they/she]

internet gryphon. admin of Beehaw, mostly publicly interacting with people. nonbinary. they/she

  • 3.23K Posts
  • 1.82K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: January 28th, 2022

help-circle

























  • alyaza [they/she]@beehaw.orgOPMtoChat@beehaw.orghow's your week going, Beehaw
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    here’s your fun fact of the day: the hierarchy of how unchecked your law enforcement is basically goes something like federal police > city police departments > rural police departments > sheriffs of any kind. apparently, while regular police are at least nominally accountable to someone higher up than them, we basically let sheriffs do whatever the fuck they want

    whatever recourse you think you have against a PD usually and very explicitly will not exist against a sheriff, even if your governor is sympathetic–most states devolve an incredible amount of power to sheriffs while demanding basically no qualifications or oversight of them. also, most outspoken police you will ever hear are probably sheriffs in specific–they are hugely over-represented in politics because there’s nothing stopping them from opining on politics even where ordinary police chiefs and the like are inhibited. (also their positions are usually elected and partisan, so they are politicians)

    naturally, the mixture of election and targeting by the far-right over the past 50ish years means like 85% of these guys are just total cranks now too, because almost all of them represent Republican-leaning counties



  • Literally just keeping the poorer drivers off the road for the richer ones.

    i’m going to remove your comment again because you’re, again, talking completely out of your ass and asserting incorrect things with unearned confidence. at most, only half of all households in New York City own a car. the average car owner in NYC is a single-family homeowner who is twice as wealthy as someone who does not own a car. people who own cars in NYC literally are the wealthy–because the poor, supposedly plighted drivers you’re appealing to don’t actually drive in the first place, they just take the subway or ride in buses. they simply are not being “priced out of driving,” however you think that works.

    but even if somehow the poor were being pushed out (they’re not)? good! cars suck, and our urban spaces should not cater to them whether they’re driven by the rich or poor! less cars mean less air pollution, less microplastics, less ambient noise, and less traffic fatalities and injuries.

    let me ask you: do you think it’s bad that noise complaints are down 70% or that traffic injuries have been cut in half because of congestion pricing? do you think it’s bad that buses–overwhelmingly servicing the city’s poor–are faster across the city because of congestion pricing? do you think it’s bad that bike lanes are being put in where car traffic has been cut significantly by congestion pricing? because i don’t, and i think those benefit poor people–who mostly don’t use cars and who are disproportionate victims of air pollution and traffic injuries and fatalities–a lot more than their potential ability to drive into lower Manhattan or whatever personal freedom you think you’re valiantly defending here.



  • yeah, no shit, that’s not the same as “your entire company being predicated on the unpaid labor of children who you also let do whatever they want without supervision or actually working filtering features”–not least because you could actually get banned for both of the things i mentioned from 2010, while what’s happening now is explicitly enabled by Roblox as their business model and an externality of doing business. as has been demonstrated by recent investigations into how they work down, they basically don’t have a company without systematically exploiting children









  • What you mean? Have you seen all those articles publisher website just giving out 8-9 on every damn game they get early access to?

    this has been an issue people have complained about in gaming journalism for–and i cannot stress this sufficiently–longer than i’ve been alive, and i’ve been alive for 25 years. so if we’re going by this metric video gaming has been “ruined” since at least the days of GTA2, Pokemon Gold & Silver, and Silent Hill. obviously, i don’t find that a very compelling argument.

    if anything, the median game has gotten better and that explains the majority of review score inflation–most “bad” gaming experiences at this point are just “i didn’t enjoy my time with this game” rather than “this game is outright technically incompetent, broken, or incapable of being played to completion”.



  • Seems like a pointlessly gendered classification.

    sports bars by default cater to a male clientele, male sports, and male interests and therefore tend to have a “bro”-ey and “masculine” atmosphere that can often be offputting or outright hostile to the presence of women–women’s sports bars by contrast don’t, and generally have more interest in being inclusive community hubs and/or acting as substitutes to gay bars

    in other words: no, it’s not really a pointlessly gendered classification in the current situation. it certainly is not what i’d call the norm (nor has it been my experience) for sports bars to have a code of conduct which tells you being homophobic or chauvinistic or ableist isn’t cool and could be grounds for your removal, as one of the women’s bars downthread has