Thanks. :)

I have no idea if it can’t load aperture libraries or not. I have never used it. But Darktable as a photo editor is the by far best one that I’ve used and I used CaptureOne and Adobe Trashroom previously. Short version is that it uses a scene-referred workflow which guarantees consistency between pictures and is basically the same process that colour editing software in the video world uses, while all other photo editing software basically only uses a display-referred process, which is a problem, since it applies a base curve and turns the raw file into a higher quality JPEG and then you only edit said higher quality JPEG, this is horrible for consistency and predictability. If you use the “recovery” option in Lightroom, you know what I’m talking about.

If you start out with Darktable, there will be a slight learning curve because every YouTube video has taught us to use curves upon curves upon curves. Which again is a problem because you’re multiplying errors. But I digress. Give it a try. It’s free to download and if you don’t like it, you don’t have to use it. I gave it a try, and I love it. But well, horses for courses.

Since you mentioned Capture One, I used it a lot and yes, they do that. I switched to Darktable a long time ago, so I don’t know where exactly this is, but there should be a drop-down menu where you can select a base curve for the display referred process, and the next menu option should be the base lut for colour, if I remember correctly.

Edit: typo. And so in your case the colour option right under the base curve should say something with “Velvia”

What software are you using for editing? It may be that Fujifilm packs a so-called raw-LUT into the raw file itself, which the software then uses to make the raw file look like a JPEG.

Think about him personally what you will, but professionally, he is the reason why we can have digital personal property today. Also the stuff he did for computing is objectively good.

Yes, well that happens if you use very small models. It does get better with more parameters, meaning it gets more consistent. How valuable the advice is, well, you can judge for yourself.

Can Elon build a submarine and invite Vance please?

Well, yes, but then what’s the point? It would be like having Wikipedia filtered through Alex Jones.

Blow the inside-Ramirez out the airlock, give the outside one some company. - The good ending. :)

Cool design.

“Put it in shady environment”. I’ll leave it in south London then…

Yes, but that’s because of the development for the cosmic desktop. After they finish it supposedly this summer it will follow Ubuntu again.

PopOS has the best support for Nvidia. It’s basically plug-and-play. Mine is the RTX 3080.

Explaination pls.

Amateur. At a previous job, I always needed to tell the interns the same thing I need to apparently tell you. Eating the worms in the salad is completely optional.

This looks like two problems. Problem one, the developer didn’t reach the film on the last strip. Secondly, it looks like the winding mechanism inside of your camera is broken. I have never seen images being this unevenly spaced.

Edit: I based this on virtue of the first two strips, basically having one picture and massive spaces of nothing on it.

Where can I find this bug? Asking for a friend. :)

It’s a cult.

Everything is flawed, there is no silver bullet. But again, it’s still a massive improvement over what we had previously.

Well, that’s the neat part. We don’t need to do that because what Flatpak does, doesn’t matter for them. People can just install Flatpak in their system and they have access to everything. I realise for system components it’s a different story, but that’s not the use case, it’s for applications.

Edit: typo.