There’s a term for repeating merely what someone says: hearsay. In no way should that be considered news or journalism.
Good journalism would be not quoting and repeating unsubstantiated claims at all.
Unless you’re going to write an article saying “spokesman makes wild and unsubstantiated claims at press conference”.
True, they’re not targeting civilians. They’re just killing everyone indiscriminately. Hell, they’ve even killed Israelis.
Maybe, but that’s not how the article is framed.
Personally, I don’t think someone spouting off should be repeated. Good journalism would be investigating and verifying the claim.
Objection, speculation.
FirstEnergy? They’re named seven separate times in the article.
Right, but if you bring it up in a discussion forum, expect people to discuss it.
See folks, this is what it looks like when the government tries to use the military against the people. The military is the people.
Thanks Mr. Betteridge
Management jobs are rarely union, since they’re the ones making the rules.
Just give them access to it now? There shouldn’t be any issue with it continuing to be available or a while if you should get hit by a bus.
primebuy looks like a ripoff of amazon, insight looks legit, but you’ll probably get what your order from either site
Removed by mod
I’d fight a bezoar. What’s the CR?
It’s effectively a sentient weapon that will attack people.
Well, yes, that’s the point. But not specifically people, but any animal coming into the territory, like wolves, coyotes, or foxes, that might kill livestock.
Those breath weapons gotta come from somewhere.
There are certainly real-life analogues. Pearls and ambergris, for example. I can’t think of any official material about it off the top of my head, but your table, your rules!
Anything in the Jellyfin logs?
You’re right, it’s a real estate trust.