

Real arguments have substance, are self-consistent, and start from reasonable assumptions.
Real arguments have substance, are self-consistent, and start from reasonable assumptions.
Listen to the real arguments and ignore the crazies?
The biggest issue is the software and tools are immature, and it’s been that way for a while.
If you get one, buy Walkabout Mini Golf. I’ve spent so long playing that and hanging out in its worlds.
At the risk of bringing up a controversial topic, this principle seems to be applied inconsistently. Eg. the people who say “men are trash” and then “if it doesn’t apply to you, it shouldn’t hurt you” would probably agree with your stance, but this is inconsistent.
There’s not really a suitable replacement unfortunately
it’s not called Lion President
lmao
Wife bad
Father I cannot swipe the book
Taxes
(Am I doing this right?)
Congrats!
Ah yes because they are equally bad
Hey Lois this is like that one time I said a gamer word flashback to the bridge
You are not paying attention to this discussion in the slightest
Nope sorry doing something good is actually bad now
Because of course every therapist only ever sees one client
This might be the most directly political XKCD I’ve seen. Go Randal!
Ooh clever. I was able to get around mine by opening sites in an iframe, I made a bookmarklet for it